Various interests are staked on the outcome of negotiations between Washington and Tehran. If they align just right, all can benefit

The current phase of relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States marks a notable convergence: the return of a moderate tendency to power in Iran coincides with Donald Trump's leadership in the US, representing a revitalized faction within the Republican Party.

However, the nuclear issue, once briefly regarded as the sole resolved point of contention between the two nations, has resurfaced as the foremost challenge since Trump's unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018. While a readily available pretext for political friction, this matter is not inherently alarming given its two-decade history; yet, it remains the linchpin of tensions between Iran and the United States.

A critical starting point for analyzing the challenges in Iran-US relations lies in assessing the positions and interests of key stakeholders.

The Arab states of the region have adopted a markedly softer and more amicable stance toward Iran compared to the periods of JCPOA negotiations, its signing, and the subsequent US withdrawal. Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain - previously strained for reasons not entirely clear - have evolved into a state of cautious friendliness, if not outright warmth. Given the geographic proximity of these nations to Iran, their deep ties with the United States, Europe, China, and Russia, and their collective influence, this shift carries significant implications for the policies of major powers concerning Iran's nuclear program.

Israel, by contrast, has consistently viewed any improvement in Iran's relations with the West, particularly the US, as a strategic red line. Throughout the JCPOA negotiations, its implementation under the Obama administration, and Trump's first term, Israel exerted maximum effort to undermine any proposed resolution to disputes involving Iran and the US, Europe, or even Arab states. For Israel, the substance of the issue is at most secondary or even nonsense; its utility lies in its potential to securitize Iran, isolating and pressuring it - a goal Tel Aviv* deems sufficiently met as long as this dynamic persists.

The EU, despite being a large and diverse union of over 20 member states, largely follows the lead of France, Germany, and the UK in foreign policy, two of which hold permanent seats on the UN Security Council. While these nations outwardly advocate for diplomatic solutions, their stance toward Iran has hardened considerably since the 2013-2018 period. Moreover, their exclusive control over the JCPOA's dispute resolution mechanism - known as the "snapback" - combined with transatlantic divergences, has imbued the issue with an identity-driven, Atlantic-spanning dimension. Consequently, while Western Europe is unlikely to spearhead bold diplomatic initiatives, it retains the capacity to disrupt progress, particularly through the snapback mechanism, motivated in part by these identity-based considerations.

Russia emerges as another pivotal actor. As one of Iran's most significant partners, having stood by Tehran during sanctions, Russia holds a prominent role in Iran's foreseeable future, including in negotiations and their aftermath. Compared to the JCPOA negotiation period, Iran-Russia relations have matured, while Moscow's ties with Washington have entered uncharted territory, shaped by the Ukraine war, Trump's eagerness to resolve it, personal rapport between the two leaders, and tensions largely stoked by Washington's European allies. However, historically, Russia neither favors an escalation of Iran-West tensions nor benefits from their complete reconciliation. This duality suggests that Tehran's policymakers should approach Moscow strategically, ensuring Russia perceives tangible benefits in supporting improved Iran-West relations - a prospect that is far from guaranteed and requires deliberate design.

China, among all actors surrounding Iran's nuclear issue and broader disputes with the West, stands as perhaps the most distant yet consistent in its declared positions. Beijing profits from sanctions on Iran - albeit indirectly - while also standing to gain from their removal, which would open a relatively untapped market to Chinese investors and contractors. Like Russia, China seeks to prevent heightened Iran-West tensions but does not necessarily welcome excessive rapprochement, which could intensify competition in Iran's market. For Iran to elevate China's role from political support to economic and operational engagement, it must astutely align any prospective agreement with Beijing's interests.

Regional actors, such as Iran's allies in West Asia - including resistance groups that are not mere proxies but longstanding anti-occupation movements - have never opposed a resolution of Iran's disputes with the West. With the Axis of Resistance having endured military setbacks over the past year, one of the West's - and particularly Israel's - primary pretexts for challenging Iran's regional role has effectively dissipated.

Before starting the recent negotiations, both Iran and the US employed a carrot-and-stick approach, blending diplomatic overtures with veiled threats. Yet, clinging to outdated policies will not yield innovative solutions in global politics. Western actors, in particular, must acknowledge that Iranian policymakers, seasoned by over four decades of managing a nation under pressure, advancing its development, and navigating critical regional and international crises, are unlikely to be cowed by familiar threats into a weaker negotiating position. Such tactics may instead erode the credibility of the West - and the Trump administration specifically - in pursuing a balanced diplomatic resolution.

This analysis proposes the following actionable recommendations to ensure enough pragmatism and fruitful talks:

These steps, if pursued with strategic foresight, could pave the way for a sustainable resolution to a decades-long impasse.

*Russia recognizes West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,as shownon the Russian Foreign Ministry's Consular Department website

(RT.com)